MALTBY’S controversial academy was Rotherham’s key to the BSF goldmine—but even its rebuild was cast into uncertainty this week.
An academy was needed somewhere in the borough in order to tap into the £222 million fund, and Maltby was chosen.
Despite a long-running protest from residents and parents, the community school reopened under its new banner in January—outside local authority control and with private sponsorship from U-xplore.
But the promise of new classrooms and facilities could be dashed—as it has been for the rest of Rotherham—when the Government reviews each academy individually.
What do you think the future should be for Maltby's planned academy? Use the "write a comment" button to post your views or click here to write a letter to the editor.
Education Secretary Michael Gove said that where academies needed to meet a demand for significant new places, building work could still go ahead.
But admissions at Maltby will be reduced this September by 90 places to 200.
Principal Dave Sutton said: “At this stage we are not clear what the announcement means for the Maltby building programme as all academy schemes are to be reviewed on a case by case basis.
“The ambition for Maltby Academy remains the same, to provide a first class learning environment and access to cutting edge technology to inspire young and old to engage in learning and achieve their full potential.
“U-xplore and the borough council appreciate how a new school building can raise aspirations and inspire young people.
“Equally, they subscribe to the academy ethos which is to raise standards of achievement and secure excellence through high quality teaching and learning.”
Mr Sutton, who is hopeful of another exam results increase this year, added that all stakeholders would be doing everything in their power over the coming months to try to secure a new building.
The long-term goal for the Braithwell Road site was for it to become an all-encompassing 0-19 years learning campus.
This now looks increasingly unlikely as the investment for Hilltop Special School is lost. A rebuilt Lilly Hall Junior and Infants was also part of the plan, but the cash would not have been from BSF.
In February 2009, Rotherham Council confirmed to the Advertiser that “some form of academy” was necessary in order for the BSF funding to be available.
No-one from Hilltop would comment this week.
Maltby Academy's future thrown into doubt.
Decision a black day for Rotherham's schools.
Flood victims miss out in schools blow.
What the Government says
Could you be the Face of Chase. Click here to find out how you can be our magazine cover star AND win a photoshoot and a modelling contract.
Check our latest videos and picture galleries.
We want to continue holding local authorities to account, attending court and council meetings, as well as providing breaking news, competitions and offers – but it costs money. Online advertising does not cover costs, therefore we feel the need to ask for your help in ensuring we can provide the best possible coverage, online and in our printed products.
For as little as £1, you can support the Rotherham Advertiser – and it only takes a minute.
Click here to support local news.