Controversial plan for battery storage unit "premature", council told

Objection: Jake Richards has warned the application is too earlyObjection: Jake Richards has warned the application is too early
Objection: Jake Richards has warned the application is too early
PLANS for a battery storage development - which would keep energy generated by solar power for use through the National Grid - have provoked a huge wave of objections.

Rotherham Council is to consider plans for the development, which would take up Green Belt land off Hard Lane, at Kiveton Park.

The site is between that village and Harthill and dozens of individual residents have contacted the council to complain about the impact it would have.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It has also generated an objection from Rother Valley MP Jake Richards, who represents the area.

He wrote to register a formal objection to the development, known as a Battery Energy Storage System, describing the application as “premature”.

His letter states the application is presented as a standalone project, but stated: “This development cannot - and should not be - looked at in isolation.

“There is a much larger project called Whitestone, which is currently being pursued as a Nationally Signficant Infrastructure Project.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“That development, covering thousands of acres, would be the largest solar installation ever attempted in the UK.

“Allowing this batter site to go ahead before the full Whitestone scheme has been properly scrutinised would be premature, and I believe, irresponsible.

“While the BESS may appear relatively modest on paper, it is clearly a crucial part of a much wider energy infrastructure network that will have far-reaching impacts on Kiveton and the surrounding areas.”

Mr Richards emphasised that he supports the transition to clean power, but added: “Until the full details of the Whitestone project are available, and the overall impact on Kiveton is properly understood, it would be entirely inappropriate to approve this application.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

He also warned that doing so could “set a dangerous precedent for how large-scale energy projects are introduced into our communities.”

Other objections include a petition, which raises questions over the historic significance of the site involved, with a suggestion that it contains the remains of a 15th Century water mill, and possibly as old as the 13th Century, with evidence of Roman activity also previously found.

The development site is near an electricity sub-station which, submissions state, has been involved in two fires previously.

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.

Follow us
©National World Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.Cookie SettingsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy notice